IN THE 23RD CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY IN HILLSBORO, MISSOURI
PEOPLE OF (
MISSOURI (
Jeff Weinhaus, etal (
Acting on behalf thereof ( CASE # _________
(
(
VS ( (
(
AARON HARVEY (
Acting in his capacity as a (
Duly sworn and appointed officer (
of Jefferson County Sheriff Dept (
Felony Criminal Complaint and Information
Comes now Jeff Weinhaus Etal; As a citizen of the STATE OF MISSOURI., with a legal interest in justice to the Citizens of Jefferson County MO. Pursuant to RSMO 545.250/22.02 do hereby allege the following unlawful acts.
Count 1) Perjury 575.040: 1. A person commits the crime of perjury if, with the purpose to deceive, he knowingly testifies falsely to any material fact upon oath or affirmation legally administered, in any official proceeding before any court, public body, notary public or other officer authorized to administer oaths. In the matter of STATE v GRIFFIN # 08JE-CR03226. On the face of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department Police Report Number 2823529, perjury is evident. On the first page of the MASTER report under Day, Date, Time and Location of occurrence; Date/Time of Occurrence 8-25-2008 @11:40P Date/Time Reported 8-25-2008 @11:40P. Date/Time Dispatched 8-25-2008 @11:40 P. Date/Time Arrived 8-25-2008. In DEFENDANT HARVEY’s narrative “ On Monday August 25 2008 at approximately 2340, I along with members of the Jefferson County Municipal Enforcement Group responded to a residence located @ 7086 Branch Road in Dittmer Missouri in reference to anonymous information of a “possible methamphetamine lab at the Residence” . The People are confused by the time line. It all happened at the same time as if they were sent. GRIFFIN alleges that her home was invaded at 10:35, so HARVEY doesn’t even have that right. The question is who sent them? The STATE of MISSOURI 08JE-CR03226 in motions for discovery has stated that there was no call. The People maintain that there was never an anonymous complaint. If there was a complaint it was far from anonymous. The complaint most likely came from TAMMY RENEE HARRIS or in the alternative the Eoff’s who own the adjacent property and it is believed that the excavating demolition business that they run has contracts with Jefferson County cleaning of all things so called “Meth houses”. The People will be able to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that this was a set-up. The question is just who it was that set this whole sordid affair in motion. If the Court would look at the following facts surrounding 07JECRO4922-01 St V TAMMY R. HARRIS, 07JE-CR03013-01. St.v TAMMY R HARRIS. It appears to the People that MS. HARRIS got a sweetheart deal in these criminal proceedings in exchange for what? The Court will note that TRISHA C STEFANSKI is the States Attorney in the abovementioned matter. The People will be able to in the least establish a reasonable doubt that the charges against GRIFFIN are fabricated and unbelievable. Are we really to believe that the Task force seized some 65 Grams of Meth out of a $3,000 trailer? They drive a 10 year old car and can’t pay their rent or child support though they are a major meth operation? Making Meth is hard work you have to crush a lot of little pills to get to 65 grams. Can the STATE provide receipts as to where GRIFFIN came up with 5,000 pills? Discovery has been asked and answered with nothing forthwith from STATE.
Count #2: Perjury 575.040: In HARVEY narrative 5 Paragraph “At that time Griffin opened the front door and advised we could come inside the residence and speak with her” Are we the People to believe that GRIFFIN invited these people in black mask into her home? The door was broken because it was kicked down. HARVEY admits that once they gained entry into the residence they “checked” the residence and observed certain illicit items. Could the Court define the difference between “Checked” and Searched? Well HARVEY so kindly already has for you. I refer you to page 2 of JCSDPRN 2829523 at the bottom of the page under Search/Warrant Permission requested for search 8-25-08 @ 11:40P The Box is checked. Permission Granted for Search is not checked and there is no time. The People maintain that the HARVEY etal illegally gained entry into the Residence by force and coercion. The People at trial will be able to prove that the MEG taskforce set this whole thing up. MS. HARRIS had a key to 7086 Branch Road and arranged for GRIFFIN to be away for the weekend by providing a condo at Silverleaf resort where MS. HARRIS was employed. The items seized unlawfully could have been planted by MS. HARRIS though most likely the so called task force just brought the items along. The Court will note the dates of the plea deals concerning MS. HARRIS. The People also find it hard to believe that Judge WILLIAMS got up at 2:45 to sign the warrant(s) yes that is plural. The People will also be able to prove that there are two different applications for warrant. The law is very specific that there are to be three copies of the same so called warrant.
Count 3: Perjury. 575.040: Most importantly we have to ask the question to the Court was HARVEY lying when he setforth in Probable cause statement that he believed JILL GRIFFIN committed a criminal offense. The whole point and purpose of this Court and the government which it represents is to give security to individual rights among these rights is the right to Liberty. The United States Constitution Article III doctrine of “Standing” requires that a plaintiff must allege personal injury fairly traceable to the defendant’s allegedly unlawful conduct, and likely to be redressed by the requested relief. The requirement for Standing however has a core component derived directly from the Constitution. The Plaintiff must allege “personal” injury fairly traceable to the defendant’s allegedly unlawful conduct, and likely to be redressed by the requested relief. Allen V Wright 468 W 737-751 (1984). The People would like to call to the Courts attention the term corpus delicti, Latin for the body of the crime. All corpus delicti requires at a minimum: 1) The occurrence of the specific injury; and 2) some criminal agency as the source of the injury. All corpus delicti requires at a minimum: For example: Homicide - 1.) An individual has died; and 2.) By a criminal act. Larceny - 1.) Property missing; and 2.) Because it was stolen. In the ST v GRIFFIN a crime was alleged to occur though in order for their to be a crime there has to a specific injury and a party that caused that injury. The only injury loss and harm as occurred to GRIFFIN by this malicious prosecution. Perhaps the Court could define who is the injured party in this matter? It would appear to the People the only crime committed is the manufactured charges by HARVEY etal; GRIFFIN has indeed been injured bruise on her leg, door kicked in, home invaded by people wearing mask. GRIFFIN has suffered loss by having to obtain now three lawyers who have stolen over $7,000 in so called “legal fees”. GRIFFIN has had irreparable harm done to her and her family. It would appear to the People that the body of the crime is in the Taskforce trunk. Let us pray the Court can see the real criminals in this matter. If the Court choices to “not-see” that would make Court just as culpable in obstructing justice. Just who has been injured, endured loss and suffered harm? It is obvious to the People that this Court would hold no subject matter jurisdiction in the matter of STATE v GRIFFIN # 08JE-CR03226. As well as STATE V GRIFFIN 09JE-CR04647. Simply put the STATE lacks Standing in the above titled actions as well as every other criminal complaint with no “personal injury”. The STATE is thus guilty of obstructing justice in thousands of cases where there is no valid cause of action
Whereas 545.020 requires a witness list. JOSPEH WOMACK, JUDGE ED WILLIAMS, FORREST WEGGE, TRISHA C STEFANSKI, SCOTT POE, SHAWN COPE, BRETT NANNEY, WILLIAM DUNN, TED GUBERMAN, CARL BEIER, SHERIFF OLIVER GLEN BOYER, RONALD SCAGGS, DET. SENGHEISER, TOMMY GALLAWAY, TAMMY HARRIS, MIKE LOWERY, MIKE NACK
Therefore Petitioner humbly demands that criminal charges be pursued by the Honorable Court that a “Grand Jury” be convened by an independent prosecutor and a special Sheriff be appointed to assemble said “Grand Jury”. The integrity of the 23rd Circuit Court is seriously in question concerning this matter and many others which are pending before the Court. These acts are just the tip of the iceberg, one could go on for days. Should the 23rd Circuit not convene the “Grand Jury” within 45 days the People reserve the right to the administration of justice to assemble and convene their own Grand Jury to be selected from the same pool the STATE would draw from. The People’s Grand Jury will also seek out indictments for those who seek to obstruct justice in this matter. Including but not limited too the above named subjects and a host of others. The People need a response from the STATE of their intentions within 45 days. The STATES refusal to reply to these allegations will be considered a full admission to the validity of the accusations. Petitioner also request that provisions be made for the security thereof under 491.640. There is a clear and present danger to Petitioner and additional security measures are needed to protect the welfare of Petitioner. Therefore Petitioner request that the sum of $5,000 to provide security measure to insure his safety and welfare. These funds should come from the victim fund established by the STATE.
Respectfully Submitted this ___________of March in the year of our Lord 2010.
JEFFREY R. WEINHAUS of lawful age being duly sworn on her affirmation states that the facts and information contained in the above felony complaint are true to his best knowledge and belief.
_________________
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ________day of March 2010
___________________